Everything about Gunpowder Plot totally explained
Image:Gunpow1.jpg|thumb|320px|A contemporary sketch of the conspirators. The Dutch artist, Crispijn van de Passe the Elder, probably never met any of the conspirators although it's known that he travelled to England around the time of the plot and may have met primary sources who could have informed his work. The sketch has become well known.|right
poly 1379 85 1548 90 1555 261 1647 332 1602 432 1661 500 1700 962 1163 964 1142 757 1193 595 1121 589 1149 531 1082 556 1236 470 1160 630 Robert Catesby
poly 1028 301 1225 67 1332 71 1313 230 1237 298 1276 335 1265 387 1227 499 1054 559 1163 651 1136 734 1091 859 986 483 Guido Fawkes
poly 1603 292 1684 152 1693 34 1812 33 1826 276 1862 307 1862 969 1791 968 Thomas Winter
poly 802 308 861 264 886 71 1024 77 991 252 1058 261 1016 328 986 482 841 727 814 730 812 614 764 521 Thomas Percy
poly 679 216 679 112 696 50 729 11 795 11 862 100 862 232 852 276 791 313 833 322 830 394 777 431 707 398 682 347 681 280 731 276 738 260 John Wright
poly 485 233 470 73 401 54 401 2 590 3 569 70 585 101 629 122 637 208 734 262 713 279 662 281 665 379 691 372 718 412 775 451 759 481 760 516 757 574 793 645 801 722 722 706 654 613 654 554 632 508 500 459 496 404 558 380 508 328 432 303 417 257 488 259 Christopher Wright
poly 174 129 172 53 314 56744 1016 641 1060 757 1032 803 976 791 976 791 917 806 929 969 359 969 203 813 166 661 171 570 210 507 Robert Winter
poly 2 188 112 206 189 363 203 503 156 591 159 683 156 754 237 935 223 966 3 967 Thomas Bates
desc none
The
Gunpowder Plot of 1605, or the
Powder Treason, as it was known at the time, was a failed attempt by a group of provincial
English Catholics to kill King
James I of England and VI of Scotland, his family, and most of the
Protestant aristocracy in a single attack by blowing up the
Houses of Parliament during the
State Opening on
5 November1605. The conspirators had also planned to abduct the royal children, not present in Parliament, and incite a revolt in the
Midlands.
The
Gunpowder Plot was one of many unsuccessful
assassination attempts against
James I, and followed the
Main Plot and
Bye Plot of 1603. Some popular historians have put forward a debate about government involvement in the plot.
On
5 November each year, people in the
United Kingdom and other
Commonwealth countries and regions celebrate the failure (or among some groups, the attempt) of the plot on what is known as
Guy Fawkes Night, Bonfire Night, Fireworks Night, Cracker Night or Plot Night; although the political meaning of the festival has grown to be very much secondary today.
Origins
The plot was overseen from May 1604 by
Robert Catesby. Catesby may have decided upon the plot when hopes of Catholic toleration under King
James I receded, leaving many Catholics disappointed. However, it's likely Catesby simply envisaged a Catholic future for England brought about by his drastic scheme. The plot was intended to begin a rebellion during which James' nine-year-old daughter (
Princess Elizabeth) could be installed as a Catholic
head of state.
Other plotters included
Thomas Winter (also spelled Wintour),
Robert Winter,
Christopher Wright,
Thomas Percy (also spelled Percye),
John Wright,
Ambrose Rokewood,
Robert Keyes, Sir
Everard Digby,
Francis Tresham, and Catesby's servant, Thomas Bates. The explosives were prepared by
Guy Fawkes, an explosives expert with considerable military experience, who had been introduced to Catesby by a man named
Hugh Owen. The well known image (top right) of the plotters was created by the Dutch artist Crispijn van de Passe, who may have had access to first hand descriptions.
The details of the plot were well known to the principal Jesuit of England, Father
Henry Garnet, as he'd learned of the plot from
Oswald Tesimond, a fellow Jesuit who, with the permission of his penitent Robert Catesby, had discussed the plot with him. As the details of the plot were known through confession, Garnet was bound not to reveal them to the authorities. Despite his admonitions and protestations, the plot went ahead, yet Garnet's opposition didn't save him from being
hanged, drawn and quartered for treason in 1606.
Planning
In May 1604 Percy leased lodgings adjacent to the
House of Lords as the plotters' idea was to mine their way under the foundations of the
House of Lords to lay the gunpowder. The main idea was to kill James, but many other important targets were to be present. Guy Fawkes as 'John Johnson' was put in charge of this building and he pretended to be Percy's servant while Catesby's house in Lambeth was used to store the gunpowder with the picks and implements for mining. However, when the
plague came again to London in the summer of 1604 and proved to be particularly severe, the opening of parliament was suspended to 1605. By Christmas Eve they'd still not reached parliament and just as they recommenced work early in 1605 they learned that the opening had been further postponed to
October 3. The plotters then took the opportunity to row the gunpowder up the Thames from Lambeth and to conceal it in their rented house. They learned by pure chance that a coal merchant called Ellen Bright had vacated a cellar under the Lords, and Percy immediately took pains to secure the lease.
Fawkes assisted in filling the room with gunpowder which was concealed beneath a wood store under the House of Lords building in a cellar leased from John Whynniard. By March 1605 they'd filled the
undercroft underneath the House of Lords with 36 barrels of gunpowder concealed under a store of winter fuel. Had they been successfully ignited, the explosion could have reduced many of the buildings in the Old Palace of Westminster complex, including the
Abbey, to rubble and would have blown out windows in the surrounding area of about a 1
kilometre radius.
The conspirators left London in May and went to their homes or to different areas of the country because being seen together would arouse suspicion. They arranged to meet again in September. However, the opening of Parliament was again postponed. The weakest part of the plot was the arrangements for the subsequent rebellion that would sweep the country and provide a Catholic monarch. Due to the requirement for money and arms Francis Tresham was eventually admitted to the plot and it was probably he who betrayed the plot by writing to his brother-in-law
Lord Monteagle. An anonymous letter revealed some of the details of the plot. The letter read 'I advise you to devise some excuse not to attend this parliament, for they'll receive a terrible blow, and yet shan't see who hurts them'.
According to the confession made by Fawkes on
5 November 1605 (Tuesday), he left
Dover on about Easter 1605 for
Calais. He then travelled to
St Omer and on to
Brussels, where he met with Hugh Owen, and Sir William Stanley. Next, he made a pilgrimage in Brabant. He returned to England at the end of August or early September, again by way of Calais.
Guy Fawkes was left in charge of executing the plot, while the other
conspirators fled to
Dunchurch in
Warwickshire to await news. Once the parliament had been destroyed, the other conspirators planned to incite a revolt in the Midlands.
Discovery
During the preparation, several of the conspirators had been concerned about fellow Catholics who would be present on the appointed day, and inevitably killed. One conspirator, possibly Francis Tresham, wrote a letter of warning to his brother-in-law
Lord Monteagle, a prominent Catholic, which he received on Friday,
October 26, at his house in
Hoxton:
My lord out of the love i bear to some of youre frends i have a care of your preseruasion therefore i would advise you as you tender your life to devise some excuse to shift of your attendance at this parliament for god and man hath concurred to punish the wickedness of this time and think not slightly of this advertisement but retire youre self into youre control where you may expect the event in saftey for though there be no appearance of any stir yet i say they'll receive a terrible blow this parliament and yet they shan't see who hurts them this councel isn't to be condemned because it may do you good and can do you no harm for the danger is passed as soon as you've burnt the letter and i hope god will give you the grace to make good use of it to whose holy protection i commend you.
Below is the same message, with modernized spelling and punctuation:
My lord, out of the love I bear to some of your friends, I've a care for your preservation. Therefore I'd advise you, as you tender your life, to devise some excuse to shift of your attendance at this Parliament, for God and man hath concurred to punish the wickedness of this time. And think not slightly of this advertisement but retire yourself into your country, where you may expect the event in safety, for though there be no appearance of any stir, yet I say they'll receive a terrible blow, the Parliament, and yet they shan't see who hurts them. This counsel isn't to be condemned, because it may do you good and can do you no harm, for the danger is past as soon as you've burnt the letter: and I hope God will give you the grace to make good use of it, to whose holy protection I commend you.
Monteagle had the note read aloud, possibly to warn the plotters the secret was out, and promptly handed it over to
Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury, the
Secretary of State. The other conspirators learned of the letter the following day, but resolved to go ahead with their plan, especially after Fawkes inspected the undercroft and found that nothing had been touched.
The tip-off led to a search of the vaults beneath the House of Lords, including the undercroft, during the night of
November 4. At midnight on
November 5 Thomas Knyvet, a
Justice of the Peace, and a party of armed men, discovered Fawkes guarding a pile of faggots, not far from about twenty barrels of gunpowder, posing as "Mr. John Johnson". A watch, slow matches, and touchpaper were found in his possession. Fawkes was arrested. Far from denying his intentions during the arrest, Fawkes stated that it had been his purpose to destroy the King and the Parliament. Later in the morning, before noon, he was again interrogated. He was questioned on the nature of his accomplices, the involvement of Thomas Percy, what letters he'd received from overseas, and whether he'd spoken with Hugh Owen.
He was taken to the
Tower of London and there interrogated under
torture. Torture was forbidden except by the express instruction of the monarch or the
Privy Council. In a letter of
November 6,
King James I stated:
"The gentler tortours [tortures] are to be first used unto him, et sic per gradus ad maiora tenditur [andthus by steps extended to greater ones], and so God speed your good work."
The discovery of the Gunpowder Plot aroused a wave of national relief at the delivery of the king and his sons and inspired in the ensuing parliament a mood of loyalty and goodwill which Salisbury astutely exploited to extract higher subsidies for the king than any but one granted in Elizabeth's reign. In his speech to both houses on 9 November, James expounded on two emerging preoccupations of his monarchy: the
divine right of kings and the Catholic question. He insisted that the plot had been the work of a few Catholics and not of the English Catholics as a whole. And he reminded the assembly to rejoice at his survival, since kings were divinely appointed and he owed his escape to a miracle.
Trial and executions
On hearing of the failure of the plot, the conspirators fled towards
Huddington Court near
Worcester, a family home of
Thomas Wintour and
Robert Wintour. Heavy rain, however, slowed their travels. Many of them were caught by Richard Walsh, the Sheriff of Worcestershire, when they arrived in
Stourbridge.
The remaining men attempted a revolt in the
Midlands. This failed, and came to an end at
Holbeach House in
Staffordshire, where there was a dramatic shoot-out ending with the death of Catesby and capture of several principal conspirators. Jesuits and others were then rounded up in other locations in Britain, with some being killed by torture during interrogation. Robert Wintour managed to remain on the run for two months before he was captured at Hagley Park.
The conspirators were tried on
January 27 1606 in
Westminster Hall. All of the plotters pleaded not guilty except for Sir Everard Digby who attempted to defend himself on the grounds that the King had gone back on promises of Catholic toleration.
Sir Edward Coke, the attorney general, prosecuted, and the
Earl of Northampton made a speech refuting the charges laid by Everard Digby. The trial lasted one day (English criminal trials generally didn't exceed a single day's duration) and the verdict was never in doubt.
The trial ranked highly as a public spectacle and there are records of up to 10 shillings being paid for entry. It is even reputed that the King and Queen attended in secret. Four of the plotters were executed in St. Paul's Churchyard on
30 January. On
January 31, Fawkes, Winter, and a number of others implicated in the conspiracy were taken to Old Palace Yard in
Westminster, in front of the scene of the intended crime, where they were to be
hanged, drawn and quartered.
Fawkes, though weakened by torture, cheated the executioners. When he was to be hanged until almost dead, he jumped from the gallows, so his neck broke and he died, thus avoiding the gruesome later part of this form of execution. A co-conspirator, Robert Keyes, attempted the same trick, but unfortunately for him the rope broke, so he was drawn fully conscious.
Henry Garnet was executed on
3 May 1606 at
St Paul's. His crime was to be the
confessor of several members of the Gunpowder Plot, and as noted he'd opposed the plot. Many spectators thought that his sentence was too severe.
Antonia Fraser writes:
"With a loud cry of 'hold, hold' they stopped the hangman cutting down the body while Garnet was still alive. Others pulled the priest's legs ... which was traditionally done to ensure a speedy death".
Historical impact
Greater freedom for Catholics to worship as they chose seemed unlikely in 1604 but after the plot in 1605 changing the law to afford Catholics leniency became unthinkable;
Catholic Emancipation took another 200 years. Nevertheless, many important and loyal Catholics retained high office in the kingdom during King James's reign.
Interest in the demonic was heightened by the Gunpowder Plot. The king himself had become engaged in the great debate about other-worldly powers in writing his
Daemonology in 1597, before he became King of England as well as Scotland. The apparent devilish nature of the gunpowder plot also partly inspired
William Shakespeare's
Macbeth. Demonic inversions such as the line
fair is foul and foul is fair are frequently seen in the play. Another possible reference made in Macbeth was to
equivocation, as Henry Garnett’s
A Treatise of Equivocation was found on one of the plotters and a resultant fear that Jesuits could evade the truth through equivocation:
Faith, here's an equivocator, that could
Swear in both the scales against either scale;
Who committed treason enough for God's sake,
Yet couldn't equivocate to heaven
- Macbeth, Act 2 Scene 3
The Gunpowder Plot was commemorated for years after the plot by special sermons and other public acts such as the ringing of church bells. It added to an increasingly full calendar of Protestant celebrations that contributed to the national and religious life of seventeenth century England. Through various permutations this has evolved into the bonfire night that occurs today.
Historians have considered the possible events that may have followed the successful implementation of the Gunpowder Plot, with the destruction of Parliament and the death of the king. Most have concluded that the violence of the act would have instead resulted in a more severe backlash towards suspected Catholics. Without the involvement of some form of foreign aid, success would have been unlikely, as most Englishmen were loyal to the institution of the monarchy despite differing religious convictions. England could very well have become a more Puritan absolute monarchy, as existed in
Sweden,
Denmark,
Saxony, and
Prussia in the seventeenth century, rather than the path of parliamentary and civil reform that occurred. It is, however, difficult to tell what would have emerged out of the resulting chaos, or to know which faction would have come to the fore ultimately.
Commemoration
The fifth of November is variously called Fireworks Night, Bonfire Night or
Guy Fawkes Night.
An
Act of Parliament (3 James I, cap 1) was passed to appoint 5 November in each year as a day of thanksgiving for "the joyful day of deliverance". The Act remained in force until 1859. On
5 November 1605, it's said the populace of London celebrated the defeat of the plot by fires and street festivities. Similar celebrations must have taken place on the anniversary and, over the years, became a tradition — in many places a holiday was observed (it isn't celebrated in
Northern Ireland).
It is still the custom in Britain on, or around, 5 November to let off
fireworks. Traditionally, in the weeks running up to the 5th, children would make "guys" — effigies supposedly of Fawkes — usually formed from old clothes stuffed with newspaper, and equipped with a grotesque mask, to be burnt on the 5 November bonfire. These effigies would be exhibited in the street to collect money for fireworks. This practice is, however, becoming increasingly rare. The word
guy came thus in the 19th century to mean a weirdly dressed person, and hence in the 20th and 21st centuries to mean any male person.
Institutions and towns may hold firework displays and bonfire parties, and the same is done on a smaller scale in back gardens throughout the country. In some areas, particularly in Sussex, there are extensive processions, large bonfires and firework displays organised by local
bonfire societies. The most extensive of this kind takes place in
Lewes.
The Houses of Parliament are still searched by the
Yeomen of the Guard before the State Opening, which, since 1928, has been held in November. Ostensibly to ensure no latter-day Guy Fawkes is concealed in the cellars, this is retained as a picturesque custom rather than a serious anti-terrorist precaution. It is said that for superstitious reasons no State Opening will be held on 5 November, but this is untrue: for instance, the State Opening was held on 5 November in 1957.
A commemorative
British two pound coin was issued in 2005 to celebrate the 400th anniversary of the plot.
The cellar in which Fawkes watched over his gunpowder was demolished in 1822. The area was further damaged in the
1834 fire and destroyed in the subsequent rebuilding of the
Palace of Westminster. The lantern Guy Fawkes carried in 1605 is in the
Ashmolean Museum,
Oxford. A key supposed to have been taken from him is in Speaker's House, Palace of Westminster. These two artifacts were exhibited in a major exhibition held in
Westminster Hall from July to November 2005.
According to Esther Forbes, a biographer, the Guy Fawkes Day celebration in the pre-revolution American Colonies, was a very popular holiday. In Boston, the revelry took on anti-authority overtones and often became so dangerous that many wouldn't venture to leave home.
Conspiracy theories
Many at the time felt that
Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury had been involved in the plot to curry favour with the king and enact more stridently anti-Catholic legislation. Such theories alleged that Cecil had either actively invented the plot or allowed it to continue when his agents had already infiltrated it, for the purposes of propaganda. These rumours were the start of a long lasting conspiracy theory about the plot. Yet while there wasn't the 'golden time' of 'toleration' for Catholics that Father Garnet had hoped for at the start of James' reign, the legislative backlash wasn't as a result of the plot. It had already happened by 1605, as
recusancy fines were re-imposed and some priests expelled. There was no purge of Catholics from power and influence in the kingdom after the gunpowder plot despite puritan complaints. The reign of James I was, in fact, a time of relative leniency for Catholics, few being subject to prosecution.
This didn't dissuade some from continuing to claim Cecil's involvement in the plot. Father John Garrett, namesake of a Jesuit priest who had performed Mass to some of the plotters, wrote an account alleging Cecil's culpability in 1897. This prompted a swift refutation a year later by the eminent historian S.R Gardiner who argued that Garrett had gone too far in trying to 'wipe away the reproach' that the plot had exacted upon generations of English Catholics.Gardiner portrayed Cecil as guilty of nothing more than opportunism. Subsequent attempts to prove Cecil's responsibility, such as Francis Edwards's 1969 work, have similarly foundered on the lack of positive proof of any government involvement in setting up the plot.. There has been little support by historians for the conspiracy theory since this time, other than to acknowledge that Cecil may have known about the plot some days before it was uncovered. However with many Internet websites suggesting Cecil's full involvement and postulating a profusion of theories, the idea lives on. It is unlikely either side will ever produce the evidence needed to convince the other of the veracity of their argument.
Modern plot analysis
According to historian
Lady Antonia Fraser, the gunpowder was taken to the
Tower of London magazine. It would have been reissued or sold for recycling if in good condition. Ordnance records for the Tower state that 18
hundredweight of it was "decayed". This could imply that it was rendered harmless due to having separated into its component chemical parts, as happens with gunpowder when left to sit for too long - if Fawkes had ignited the gunpowder, during the opening, it would only have resulted in a weak splutter. Alternatively, "decayed" may refer to the powder being damp and sticking together, making it unfit for use in firearms. In this case the explosive capabilities of the barrels wouldn't be greatly affected.
, a study on an
ITV programme presented by
Richard Hammond broadcast on
1 November 2005 re-enacted the plot, by blowing up an exact replica of the 17th century
House of Lords filled with test dummies, using the exact amount of gunpowder in the underground of the building. The dramatic experiment, conducted on the Advantica Spadeadam test site, proved unambiguously that the explosion would have killed all those attending the State Opening of Parliament in the Lords chamber.
The power of the explosion, which surprised even gunpowder experts, was such that seven-foot deep solid concrete walls (made deliberately to replicate how archives suggest the walls in the old House of Lords were constructed) were reduced to rubble. Measuring devices placed in the chamber to calculate the force of the blast were themselves destroyed by the blast, while the skull of the dummy representing King James, which had been placed on a throne inside the chamber surrounded by courtiers, peers and bishops, was found a large distance away from the site. According to the findings of the programme, no-one within 100 metres of the blast would have survived, while all the stained glass windows in
Westminster Abbey would have been shattered, as would all windows within a large distance of the Palace. The power of the explosion would have been seen from miles away. Even if only half the gunpowder had gone off, everyone in the House of Lords and its environs would have been killed instantly.
A sample of the gunpowder may have survived. In March 2002, workers investigating archives of
John Evelyn at the
British Library found a box containing various samples of gunpowder and several notes that suggested they were related to the Gunpowder Plot:
- "Gunpowder 1605 in a paper inscribed by John Evelyn. Powder with which that villain Faux (sic) would have blown up the parliament.",
- "Gunpowder. Large package is supposed to be Guy Fawkes' gunpowder".
- "But there was none left! WEH 1952
References in pop culture
The graphic novel
V for Vendetta by
David Lloyd and
Alan Moore and its 2006
film adaptation contain frequent references to November the 5
th, including opening with a description of the Gunpowder Plot, and the protagonist's costume based on the classic depiction of Guy Fawkes.
Guy Fawkes day was used in an episode of
The Avengers. In this episode entitled "November Five" the Avengers investigate the theft of a nuclear warhead. The thief plans to detonate it in the
Houses of Parliament on November the fifth, just like Fawkes.
In
John Lennon's song, "
Remember", the date is referenced in the final line. The last verse is, "No, no, remember, remember the fifth of November," followed by the sound of an explosion.
The
Kate Walsh song "Fireworks" is about her disliking Guy Fawkes day because it reminds her of perhaps a former lover or someone otherwise close to her.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Gunpowder Plot'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://gunpowder_plot.totallyexplained.com">Gunpowder Plot Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |
